On New Year’s Day the general minimum wage in New York City stays at $17 an hour. The State says one of the 2023 wage law’s “off-ramps” has been met, so the rise with prices the law schedules is off (the State’s notice); the Governor’s memo says it was the jobs test. A Council bill would go much further, to $30 by 2030 for employers of more than 500 workers nationwide and the franchisees of chains that size.
So how many New Yorkers earn less than thirty dollars now? Through September 2026, about half: 52% of the city’s residents who work for wages, in the monthly survey behind the unemployment rate, with a margin of about three points. The survey fills in nearly half of its earnings answers from similar respondents; among the rest the share is 48%, and both are in this year’s dollars.
The long record is the census’s, in 2024 dollars. After inflation, the minimum wage nearly doubled from 1989 to 2024, from $8.58 to $16.
The median worker’s pay ended near where it began, $30.72 then and $29.29 in 2024, after falling and recovering in between. The floor climbed toward a middle that ended where it began, and about half of the city’s wage-earners sat under thirty dollars at both ends.
However, the floor has lost ground since its peak: in 2024 dollars it was worth $18.02 in 2019 and $15.86 this year. Next year’s pause holds the dollar rate, not what it buys.
The Governor proposes $17.60 from 1 March, if legislators approve a narrower jobs test (the Governor’s page).
The floor nearly doubled after inflation, most of it since 2013
The minimum wage is a legal rate, so its history is exact: from 1989 to 2024 it rose by 87% after inflation, in 2024 dollars, and most of that rise came after 2013.
Through the 1990s and 2000s the floor sat between about eight and eleven dollars in 2024 money, the federal rate binding from 1996 to 2000 and the State’s raises of 2005 to 2007 lifting it only to about ten and a half.
Then it climbed. The floor reached eight dollars at the end of 2013 and nine two years later; in April 2016 the Governor signed what the State called the “$15 plan”, which took the city’s employers of at least eleven workers to $11 that December and $15 at the end of 2018 (the 2016 release). The State said the plan would lift the earnings of more than 2.3 million New Yorkers, its own estimate for the whole state.
In 2024 dollars the floor peaked at $18.02 in 2019, the first full year at fifteen dollars for the larger employers the series follows; the smaller ones reached it a year later.
The 2023 budget raised it again, to sixteen dollars in 2024 and seventeen in 2026, and tied it to prices from 2027, with an “off-ramp” for “certain economic or budget conditions” (the Governor’s office, December 2023). Prices have outrun the steps: this year’s seventeen dollars is worth $15.86, 12% below the 2019 peak.
Next year is the first the off-ramps apply, and one has. The law’s employment test sets the State’s seasonally adjusted job count in July against April’s and January’s; the Governor’s memo says that test fired, and quotes a different figure, a monthly decline of 0.07% from January to July in private education, hospitality and retail jobs, which these surveys don’t rebuild (Program Bill #44). The memo calls the test “overly sensitive”, attributes the dip in part to immigration enforcement, visa policies and tariffs, which is the Governor’s explanation and not a finding here, and would replace the test with a less sensitive one; the questions have the law’s three conditions and the proposed formula.
The share under thirty dollars returned to about half, after a decade nearer three in five
The census asks about pay every year, and did in the 1990 and 2000 counts before that. It records a year’s wages, the hours of a usual week and the weeks worked, which give an hourly wage, and we put every year in 2024 dollars.
In 2024, 51% of the city’s residents who work for wages were paid less than thirty dollars an hour. In 1989, by the same measure and in the same dollars, it was 49%.
About half or more of the city's working residents have been paid under $30 an hour since 1989
Microdata estimate Tabulated directly from survey microdata, with no model in between: every variable in the chart is observed in the same record, so the relationship shown is measured rather than modelled. It is still an estimate from a sample, not a count of everyone, and the ticks are 90% margins from the survey’s replicate weights.Share of New York City residents who work for wages paid under $30 an hour, in 2024 dollars
The interactive chart needs JavaScript; its numbers are in the table below.
How to read this, and what it cannot show
One point per survey year; the 1990 and 2000 censuses asked about pay in 1989 and 1999. Ticks are 90% margins from the replicate weights. Hover or tap a year for its share.
The numbers behind this chart
About these numbers. Hourly pay is a year's wages over usual weekly hours times weeks worked. The 1989 and 1999 points come from the decennial census long form, the later ones from the American Community Survey: a change of survey, at the gap in the line. No margin is calculated for the censuses; 2020 was an experimental file and its margin is not shown; the 2005 file left out group quarters. Weeks were recorded in bands from 2008 to 2018 and are set at each band's mean. Dollars are 2024 dollars on the New York-area consumer price index.
| Group | 1989 (1990 census) | 1999 (2000 census) | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paid under $30 an hour | 49% | 51% | 54% ± 0.8% | 58% ± 0.5% | 57% ± 0.5% | 58% ± 0.6% | 56% ± 0.7% | 58% ± 0.5% | 59% ± 0.6% | 58% ± 0.6% | 58% ± 0.6% | 59% ± 0.7% | 57% ± 0.6% | 56% ± 0.6% | 55% ± 0.6% | 55% ± 0.6% | 52% ± 0.5% | 49% | 48% ± 0.6% | 50% ± 0.7% | 50% ± 0.6% | 51% ± 0.6% |
The share was nearer three in five from 2006 to 2015 and back to about half by 2019. The first two points come from the census’s long form and the rest from the American Community Survey, which asks the same questions in a different survey, so part of the step between 1999 and 2005 may be the change of survey.
This year’s 52% comes from a different survey again, the monthly one, in this year’s money and from a usual week’s pay rather than a year’s, so it sits beside the census line rather than on it.
The floor climbed toward a middle that ended where it began
The median and the share under a fixed line are two readings of one pay distribution, and neither was steady throughout. The median worker’s pay was $30.72 in 1989, sagged to $24.97 in 2014 and was $29.29 in 2024.
What moved is the floor, from 28% of the middle to 55%.
The floor climbed toward a middle that ended where it began
Computed Survey records combined with published parameters, such as a tax schedule or a budget standard. The tick is the survey margin on the computed quantity; the parameters carry their own uncertainty, and the FAQ gives the range under alternative assumptions.The minimum wage in New York City and the median hourly pay of its residents who work for wages, in 2024 dollars
The interactive chart needs JavaScript; its numbers are in the table below.
How to read this, and what it cannot show
The minimum is the year’s average of the rate in force each day. The median comes from the 1990 and 2000 censuses and from the ACS every year since 2005. The bill’s line is a projection: its dollar amounts deflated at an assumed 2.5% a year. Hover or tap a line for its values.
The numbers behind this chart
About these numbers. The minimum is the higher of the State's and the federal rate on each day, averaged over the year; from 2017 the City's rate for employers of 11 or more. Median pay is from the 1990 and 2000 censuses (1989 and 1999 pay) and the ACS from 2005, a change of survey. The bill's steps for 2027 to 2030 are its rates for employers of more than 500, deflated at an assumed 2.5% a year after August 2026, not a forecast.
| Group | 1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | 2030 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median hourly pay of residents who work for wages | 31 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 29 | – | – | – | – | – | 27 ± 0 | 27 ± 0 | 26 ± 0 | 26 ± 0 | 27 ± 0 | 27 ± 0 | 26 ± 0 | 26 ± 0 | 25 ± 0 | 25 ± 0 | 25 ± 0 | 27 ± 0 | 27 ± 0 | 28 ± 0 | 29 ± 0 | 31 | 31 ± 0 | 30 ± 0 | 30 ± 0 | 29 ± 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| The minimum wage, the year's average | 9 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 14 | 16 | 18 | 18 | 17 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | – | – | – | – |
| Int 0757's rate for large employers, at an assumed 2.5% a year inflation | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 18 | 20 | 23 | 25 |
Why the middle ended where it began, these counts can’t say. They are snapshots of different workers each year, not a record of the same workers or jobs over time, so they can’t separate a changing mix of work from changes in pay within jobs.
So where would the bill’s thirty dollars land? They arrive in 2030, after four more years in which prices are assumed to keep rising, and prices in the New York area are already 8.4% above their 2024 average.
At an assumed 2.5% a year from here, the 2030 rate is worth about $25.43 in 2024 dollars; each alternative rate tested in the questions lands within a dollar of that.
The census can’t tell employers apart by size, so the shares below are not a count of who would get the bill’s top rate. They apply that rate’s 2024 value to every private and non-profit employee whose work is done in the five boroughs and who lives in the New York area the extract covers, city residents working from home included; commuters from beyond that area are missing. The bill leaves out government employers, and its smaller employers would pay twenty-seven in 2030 and twenty-nine a year later.
In 2024, 47% of those workers, about 1.7 million, were paid less than thirty dollars an hour, a year’s pay over its hours.
Under the 2030 rate in 2024 dollars it was 40%, about 1.45 million.
Counting every employee working in the city, government included, it was 39%.
Set against the middle of those private-sector workers, the 2030 rate in 2024 dollars equals 79% of their 2024 median, $32.21. Where it lands in 2030 depends on how pay moves by then.
The workers under thirty dollars are mostly full-time and twenty-five or older, and care, food, cleaning and retail lead the list
Who are the private-sector workers paid under thirty dollars? Service work is the largest occupation group, about a third of them, and home health aides the largest single occupation: 89% of them were paid less than that in 2024, and their own minimum, higher than the general one, rises to twenty dollars in January. Cashiers, cooks and personal care aides were about nine in ten.
Most care, food, cleaning and retail workers are paid under $30
Microdata estimate Tabulated directly from survey microdata, with no model in between: every variable in the chart is observed in the same record, so the relationship shown is measured rather than modelled. It is still an estimate from a sample, not a count of everyone, and the ticks are 90% margins from the survey’s replicate weights.The ten occupations with the most private-sector workers in the city paid under $30 an hour in 2024: the share of each paid less
The interactive chart needs JavaScript; its numbers are in the table below.
How to read this, and what it cannot show
From the 2024 census survey, not this year’s monthly one: private and non-profit employees working in the five boroughs, each dot the share of one occupation’s workers paid under thirty dollars. Hover or tap a dot for its 90% margin.
The numbers behind this chart
About these numbers. Private and non-profit employees whose work is done in the five boroughs, wherever they live, and city residents who work from home. The Council bill excludes government employers; its $30 in 2030 is for employers of more than 500, which the census does not identify. Ordered by the share.
| Group | 2024 |
|---|---|
| Home health aides | 89% ± 2.2% |
| Cashiers | 93% ± 2.3% |
| Retail salespersons | 77% ± 4.1% |
| Construction laborers | 79% ± 4.1% |
| Janitors and building cleaners | 79% ± 4.5% |
| Personal care aides | 90% ± 3.5% |
| Security guards | 75% ± 5.0% |
| Cooks | 91% ± 3.3% |
| Customer service representatives | 63% ± 4.8% |
| Truck and delivery drivers | 77% ± 4.7% |
By industry, health care holds the largest block, about a quarter of the private-sector workers paid under thirty dollars. Five natural questions follow about who these workers are; the files answer three, bound one and can’t reach one.
They are mostly young. Not so. Workers under twenty-five are the likeliest to be under the line, 77% of them, but they are 16% of the workers below it; the largest block, 36%, is aged thirty-five to fifty-four, and no age band is a majority.
They are mostly immigrants. Not testable here: these tabulations group workers by citizenship, not birthplace. Half of the workers under the line, 50%, were citizens from birth.
Non-citizens were the likeliest to be under it, 62% of them, then naturalised citizens at 51%, against 40% of citizens from birth.
It’s part-time work. Mostly not: 72% of the workers under thirty dollars usually work thirty-five hours or more a week, the census’s full-time line, though part-timers are far more often under the line.
Pay has risen since the pandemic. The share under the line fell; a rise in the median is unresolved. These comparisons are among the city’s residents who work for wages, not the workplace sample above, in 2024 dollars.
The share paid under thirty dollars fell from 52% in 2019 to 51% in 2024, a fall of 1.9 points on the unrounded estimates with a margin of 0.8, which holds.
Over the same years the median went from $29.17 to $29.29, a rise of $0.12 with a margin of $0.38, which could still be chance.
The minimum wage hasn’t kept up with prices. Since 1989 it has, up 87% after inflation by 2024; since its 2019 peak it has not, down 12% by this year, and under current law the general rate stays put in January.
The records measure the floor against today’s pay, not what a higher floor would change
What the records settle is the distance. In 2024 dollars the floor rose from under a third of the median worker’s pay to more than half, the median ended near where it began after a fall and a recovery, and about half of the city’s wage-earning residents sit under thirty dollars; among the private-sector workers in the city under that line, most work full-time and are twenty-five or older.
What they leave open is what a floor of thirty dollars would change, which another count of pay cannot settle. An estimate of its effect would need a credible picture of what pay, hours and jobs would have done without the raise, set against what they did, which is a different kind of evidence from these yearly snapshots.
One date is fixed and one is conditional. On 1 January 2027 the general rate stays at seventeen dollars under current law; on 1 March it would rise to $17.60 if the Legislature approves the Governor’s bill.
The Council’s bill sits in committee, where its record shows no action since its referral on 10 March, and a city rate above the State’s would need Albany’s permission, which a Senate bill re-referred to the Labor Committee in January would give. The census’s 2025 file, not yet released, and the monthly survey’s remaining months will refresh these counts, not settle what a higher floor would do.
Questions this raises
What the recent coverage says, checked against these records
- 36.7% of the city’s jobs under $30 (the Economic Policy Institute’s projection for 2030, August 2025). A projection, not a count: the Institute took the 2023 one-year census file and grew each worker’s pay at 3.3% a year to 2030. Doing the same with the same file, and counting work done in the city, gives 36.5% under thirty dollars, 0.2 points from the published 36.7%, and a ratio of the 2030 minimum to the 2030 median of 0.75 against its 0.76. Counting residents instead gives 40.7%, further from it, so it most likely counts work done in the city, including commuters; the Institute’s post does not say.
- “The highest in the nation” (WABC, 10 March 2026). A ranking of legal rates in other cities and states, which these files don’t hold; we don’t rebuild it.
- The existing rate “leaves too many New Yorkers in poverty” (the bill’s sponsor, as WABC reported her). Not testable here: these files count pay, not poverty.
- Smaller companies reach the mark two years later (WABC: they “would hit this mark by 2032”). The bill as introduced sets $29 in 2031 for employers of 500 or fewer and an indexed rate from 2032; it names no thirty-dollar step for them. The report’s “less than 500” follows the bill’s own summary; its text divides employers at more than 500 against 500 or fewer.
- Jobs “declined slightly, by a monthly 0.07% from January to July” (the Governor’s memo). The memo’s figure is for private education, hospitality and retail jobs; the law’s test is the State’s total seasonally adjusted job count. Both come from the State’s payroll count of employers, which these files don’t rebuild, so the figure is quoted, not checked.
Why do the shares under thirty dollars differ?
Because each counts different people in different dollars, as the table in the story sets out: residents against everyone working in the city, private employers against all, 2024 dollars against this year’s, and a count against a projection. The census’s 51% describes pay in 2024 from a year’s earnings; the monthly survey’s 52% covers January to September 2026 from a usual week’s pay, in this year’s dollars. Subtracting one from the other would not measure a change.
How sure is the 2030 figure in 2024 dollars?
As sure as the inflation assumption under it. Prices in the New York area are measured to August 2026; after that we assume 2.5% a year, which is an assumption, not a forecast. At 2% a year the 2030 rate would be worth $25.86 in 2024 dollars, and at 3.5% $24.60. Across that range, about two in five private-sector workers were paid less than it in 2024.
How reliable are these hourly wages?
Less reliable at the bottom than in the middle. The census does not ask for an hourly wage: we divide a year’s wages, tips and commissions by the usual weekly hours times the weeks worked, and each answer carries some error. The result is an average over the year, across every job a person held. 18% of residents in 2024 come out below $15.57, the lowest general minimum in force over the year the survey asked about. The arithmetic can’t tell reporting errors, job changes, mixed wage and self-employed work or underpayment apart, so we quote no share below about twenty dollars in the story.
The monthly survey asks directly about a usual week’s pay and hours, but it fills in missing earnings from similar respondents nationwide: this year 46% of the city’s records had their earnings filled in, and among the others the share under thirty dollars was 48%. Its median this year, $28.85, equals $60,000 a year over a forty-hour, 52-week year.
Does the 1989 comparison depend on how prices are measured?
Not much. We put every year in 2024 dollars with the New York-area consumer price index. The Bureau of Labor Statistics also publishes a research series that restates the national index for past years with today’s methods, which measure less inflation; part of the difference is also national prices against New York’s. On that series the 1989 median comes to $29.48 instead of $30.72, even closer to 2024’s $29.29, and the 1989 minimum to $8.23. Either way, the middle ended about where it began.
What happens to the minimum wage on 1 January 2027?
The general rate stays at $17 in New York City, Long Island and Westchester. From 2027 the law raises the rate each year by the average change over the three latest August-to-July periods in the Northeast region’s consumer price index for urban wage earners and clerical workers, a different index from the New York-area one our dollars use. Any of three conditions stops the following year’s rise:
- that index’s average for the latest August-to-July period is below the preceding period’s;
- the three-month average of the State’s seasonally adjusted unemployment rate to July is half a point or more above its low of the previous twelve months;
- the State’s seasonally adjusted total non-farm employment in July is below both April’s and January’s.
A pause can run at most two years in a row. The Governor’s memo says the employment condition was met, and gives a figure for private education, hospitality and retail jobs, a monthly decline of 0.07% from January to July. Her bill would replace that jobs test alone, not the other two, with one that pauses the raise when the median of the monthly rates of change worked out from the latest twelve, six and three months falls below −0.25%, and would set the new rates for 1 March 2027. Home care aides are the exception: their rate rises to $20.00 in the city on 1 January. In 2024 dollars this year’s rate is worth $15.86, a little less than 2024’s, and with no raise it will be worth less again next year if prices keep rising. Tipped food-service workers have a lower cash wage, made up by tips.
What does the Council bill say?
Employers with more than 500 employees nationwide, and franchisees of networks that large, would pay at least $20 from January 2027, then $23, $26 and $30 in 2030. Employers of 500 or fewer would pay $19 in 2027 rising to $29 in 2031. After that both rates would follow the national consumer price index. Federal, State and City government employers are excluded. Until 1 December 2031 a food-service worker who receives tips could be paid at least two-thirds of the rate, or the State’s tipped rate if higher, provided the tips make up the rest. The bill, Int 0757-2026, was introduced by Council Member Sandy Nurse on 10 March with fifteen Council sponsors and referred to the Committee on Consumer and Worker Protection, and its record shows no action since. The city can’t do it alone: a State bill that would let it set a minimum above the State’s was re-referred to the Senate’s Labor Committee on 7 January 2026.
Where are the workers under thirty dollars?
By industry, health care and social assistance had the most, about a quarter, and in retail and in restaurants, hotels and the arts about seven in ten workers were paid under thirty dollars. By occupation group, about four in five service workers were. Women were a little more often under the line than men, and part-time workers far more often than full-time ones. The data file at the end has every group with its margin.
Under the hood
Pay. Hourly pay is a year’s wage and salary income, tips and commissions included, over usual weekly hours times weeks worked, for people 16 and over who work for wages (private, non-profit and government employees; the self-employed are left out) and were at work or had a job when interviewed. It is an average over the twelve months before the interview (the censuses asked about the previous calendar year), across every job held, assigned to the person’s current occupation and workplace. A rate under a dollar an hour is left out, a cleaning rule for extreme values rather than a diagnosis of each record. The 1990 and 2000 censuses asked about the previous year, so their points sit at 1989 and 1999. From 2008 to 2018 the census recorded weeks in bands; we use each band’s average in the years it recorded the exact number (2005 to 2007), since most people in the top band worked all 52 weeks. The 1990 and 2000 figures come from the census long form and the rest from the American Community Survey, a change of survey. Full-time means usual hours of 35 or more a week.
Dollars. The ACS files from 2015 are in 2024 dollars already; earlier years are adjusted with the Bureau’s within-year factor and the New York-area consumer price index, and the censuses with the index of the year their pay was earned. The 2026 minimum uses the index’s months to August. The law indexes the minimum wage to a different series, the Northeast region’s CPI-W.
The minimum wage. The higher of the State’s and the federal rate on each day, averaged over the year; from December 2016 the City’s rate for employers of 11 or more, which reached fifteen dollars a year before the rate for smaller employers. Each rate is checked against the State’s and the federal histories.
The history. Each date, rate and figure the story takes from a law, a release or a memo is looked up in the saved copy of that document when the figures are built, and the build fails if the words are not there; the figures printed from them (the $11 and $15 of 2016, the 2.3 million, the $16 of 2024, the 0.07% and the 0.25%, the fifteen sponsors) are read from those quotes, not typed. They describe the laws, not the surveys, and none is set against a survey count.
Working in the city. Employees whose place of work is in the five boroughs and who live in the New York metropolitan area the extract covers (the city and its suburbs in the three states), plus city residents who work from home. The census asks where people worked only of those at work in the survey week, so the 2% of employed residents who had a job but were away from it are counted among residents, not here. Private means private for-profit and non-profit employers.
This year. The Current Population Survey’s outgoing rotation groups, January to September 2026: usual weekly earnings on the main job over usual weekly hours, in this year’s dollars, with the earnings weight. Margins are clustered on the household and are approximate.
Margins. Census margins are 90% margins from the replicate weights; a median’s margin is a Woodruff interval, the method behind the Bureau’s published medians, read off quarter-dollar bins, and the 2008-2018 margins take the weeks-band means as fixed. No margin is calculated for the 1990 and 2000 samples. The 2020 file was experimental and its margin is not shown, and the 2005 file left out people in group quarters, whom the later files include. Groups with fewer than 30 records are not published. A change’s margin combines the two years’ margins as independent samples. A change is called a rise or a fall only when its range clears zero: the share under thirty dollars from 2019 to 2024 does, and the median’s change does not.
Code and checks. One script, analysis.py (linked below), produces every figure and chart and checks each rate and quotation against the saved pages. The dataset cards behind it (census_history, acs1_pums, cps_basic, bls_labour) list the traps.
Continue exploring New York
What people do in New York
New York City has more payroll jobs than ever, a record 4.9 million in July 2026, and health care is its largest sector.
Who still goes to the office
Working from home has settled rather than faded, and it has settled on the better paid.
- Explore this dataset: the data and the code behind every number above.
- All articles · Search · RSS
SparkyData Weekly
Once a week, one New York theme: what the public data says about it, and the week's new articles.
Free, weekly, and one click to leave. Your address is held by Buttondown, which sends it; see the privacy policy.
Sources
- U.S. Census Bureau — American Community Survey one-year public-use microdata (PUMS), 2005-2024 (One-year files 2005-2024 (the 2020 file experimental); the 2025 file not yet released) — Hourly pay of residents who work for wages, every year from 2005; for 2019, 2023 and 2024, workers whose workplace is in the five boroughs, by occupation, industry, age, hours and citizenship
- U.S. Census Bureau — 1990 and 2000 Census, 5% public-use microdata samples (1990 PUMS A (pay in 1989) and 2000 PUMS 5% (pay in 1999), New York) — Hourly pay of residents who work for wages in 1989 and 1999; no replicate weights, so no margin
- U.S. Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics — Current Population Survey, basic monthly public-use files (January to September 2026, the outgoing rotation groups (the earnings sample)) — The share of the city's residents who work for wages paid under $30 an hour this year, and their median hourly pay
- Bureau of Labor Statistics — Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, New York-Newark-Jersey City, and the research series R-CPI-U-RS (Monthly to August 2026 (no October 2025); R-CPI-U-RS annual averages to 2025) — Every year's pay and minimum wage in 2024 dollars; the check of 1989 against a national index restated with today's methods
- New York State Department of Labor — History of the Minimum Wage in New York State (Read 13 October 2026) — Every State rate and its effective date, and New York City's rates by employer size from 31 December 2016
- New York State Department of Labor — New York State Minimum Wage (rates as of 1 January 2027) (Read 13 October 2026) — The minimum stays $17.00 in New York City on 1 January 2027 because one of the law's off-ramp conditions was met; the home care rate rises to $20
- Office of the Governor — New York State Minimum Wage 2027 (Undated page, read 13 October 2026) — The proposal to change the off-ramp: $17.60 in New York City from 1 March 2027 if the Legislature approves
- Office of the Governor — Program Bill #44 memorandum: refining the off-ramp methodology for minimum wage adjustments (Undated memo posted in October 2026; read 18 October 2026) — Which off-ramp fired (the jobs test), the figure the memo gives for it (a monthly 0.07% decline from January to July in private education, hospitality and retail jobs), the Governor's attribution of the dip, and the proposed −0.25% test
- New York State Senate — Labor Law § 652, Minimum wage (The consolidated law as displayed on 18 October 2026) — Subdivision 1-b: the yearly indexing to the Northeast CPI-W from 2027 and the three off-ramp conditions, for at most two consecutive years
- Office of the Governor — Governor Cuomo Signs $15 Minimum Wage Plan and 12 Week Paid Family Leave Policy into Law (Press release of 4 April 2016, read from the Internet Archive's copy of 10 January 2017) — The $15 plan's schedule for New York City employers of at least 11 employees: $11 at the end of 2016, $2 a year, $15 on 31 December 2018; the State's own estimate of 2.3 million New Yorkers statewide
- Office of the Governor — Governor Hochul Reminds New Yorkers of Upcoming Minimum Wage Increase (Press release of 27 December 2023, read 18 October 2026) — The 2023 budget's schedule ($16 in 2024, $16.50 in 2025, $17 in 2026 in New York City), the indexing from 2027 and the off-ramp as the Governor's office described it
- U.S. Department of Labor — History of Federal Minimum Wage Rates Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 1938-2009 (Read 13 October 2026) — The federal rates that bound in New York from October 1996 to March 2000
- New York City Council — Int 0757-2026, establishment of the minimum wage (Legistar) (Introduced 10 March 2026; in the Committee on Consumer and Worker Protection; read 13 October 2026) — The schedule for employers of more than 500 and of 500 or fewer, the franchise definition, the tipped rate, the exclusion of government employers, the sponsors and the committee record
- New York State Senate — S3952 (2025-2026), local wage authority for New York City (Re-referred to the Labor Committee 7 January 2026; read 13 October 2026) — The State bill that would let the city set a minimum above the State's
- Economic Policy Institute — A '$30 by 2030' minimum wage in New York City is a bold proposal (Working Economics Blog) (Published 28 August 2025; read from the Internet Archive's copy of 18 July 2026) — Table 2: 36.7% of the city's wage-earning workforce under $30 in 2030 without a policy change, reproduced from the same 2023 file
- WABC-TV — New York City Council considers bill to raise minimum wage to nation-leading $30 (Report of 10 March 2026, read 18 October 2026) — The readings checked in the questions: 'the highest in the nation', the sponsor's statement on poverty as reported, and the smaller-employer schedule as reported
How to cite
Reference
BibTeX
Quote the version: a correction bumps it, and the corrections log says what changed. Charts can be embedded from the “Embed this chart” link under each one.